Eyeshadow Singles Possessed Pearl dupes and alternatives Half Magic
4.0 (271)·Taupe · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Lighter· Silver rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Silver rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Deeper· Green rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Green rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: an olive green with silver shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: golden metallic taupe with rich tawny shimmer/ holographic blushed gold with shifts of silver & gold sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than taupe· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than taupe · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Silver rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Silver rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Green rather than taupe· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Green rather than taupe · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than taupe· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than taupe · Stick rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Red rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Red rather than taupe · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: red with green & white sparkle
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than taupe
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: light champagne gold with silver sparkle
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Trooper, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Possessed Pearl. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePossessed PearlClosest shade matchTrooperHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%93#a69b91#a99e97Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDryNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 57/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Fine As Fleck Glitter Eyeshadow in So Metal, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Possessed Pearl. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePossessed PearlClosest overall alternativeSo MetalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%59#a69b91#af9680Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall86
Finish65%100GlitterGlitterSameSame glitter finish
Pigmentation20%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 73/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $23 more
