Eyeshadow Singles Wet Pebble dupes and alternatives Half Magic
4.0 (271)·Taupe · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Grey rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Looks identical · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Grey rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm taupe / a shimmering blackened green
Differences: Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Silver rather than taupe· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than taupe · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Natural rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
27
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Nude 9, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Wet Pebble. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWet PebbleClosest shade matchNude 9How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#a0816a#9f8471Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall29
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDryNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 67/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme Ombre Hypnôse Stylo Shadow Stick Matte Metallics in 04 Brun Captivant, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Wet Pebble. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWet PebbleClosest overall alternative04 Brun CaptivantHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%87#a0816a#a78470Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100TaupeTaupeSameSame colour family
Overall match 84/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $11 more
