Eyeshadow Singles Lil' Deranged dupes and alternatives Half Magic
4.0 (271)·Green · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: an olive green with silver shimmer
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: an olive green with a walnut shift
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than green· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than green · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than green· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than green · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: dark chocolate metallic with golden glimmer/
gold foil with lustrous Gold sparkle
Clinique All About Shadow Quad Eyeshadow in On Safari, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Lil' Deranged. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLil' DerangedClosest shade matchOn SafariHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%75#8f895d#968a4eClose colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique High Impact Shadow Play Eye Shadow + Definer in Mixed Greens, against Half Magic Eyeshadow Singles in Lil' Deranged. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLil' DerangedClosest overall alternativeMixed GreensHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%72#8f895d#989171Close colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreenGreenSameSame colour family
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $14 more
