Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (74%)4.3 (1,866)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Not listed rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Not listed rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Ulta Beauty Collection Sculpting Peptide Lip Liner with Brush Tip in Almond Biscotti, against Huda Beauty Lip Contour 2.0 Automatic Matte Lip Pencil in Sandy Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSandy BeigeClosest shade matchAlmond BiscottiHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%99#ca7e6e#c97d6cLooks identicalColour difference 0.5 (0 is identical)
Depth20%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family10%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared66
Longevity30%709-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 9-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableRetractableNot listedNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 81/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Make Up For Ever Artist Color Pencil Extreme Smudge-Proof Lip Liner in 136 Legendary Latte, against Huda Beauty Lip Contour 2.0 Automatic Matte Lip Pencil in Sandy Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSandy BeigeClosest overall alternative136 Legendary LatteHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall93
Colour60%96#ca7e6e#c87a6aLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth20%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family10%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall100
Finish100%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Wear & performance25% of overall88
Longevity30%709-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 9-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Smudge and transfer30%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim smudge or transfer resistance
Format and precision20%85RetractablePencilClosePencil rather than retractable
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 91/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.