Lip Contour 2.0 Automatic Matte Lip Pencil Universal Red dupes and alternatives Huda Beauty
4.7 (1,440)·Red · Neutral · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Same format and precision: retractable
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: matte red with blue undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (74%)4.3 (1,866)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Not listed rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Not listed rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 33% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: deep, rich red with blue undertones
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Cream rather than retractable (format and precision) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof· Same format and precision: retractable
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than red· Not listed rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than red · Not listed rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than red
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
91
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (39%)4.4 (5,141)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Same format and precision: retractable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
79
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Long-wearing rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$3.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.01 less (83%)4.0 (1,970)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Not listed rather than 9-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
49
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Not listed rather than 9-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Too Faced Lip Injection Extreme Lip Shaper Plumping Lip Liner in Happily Ever After, against Huda Beauty Lip Contour 2.0 Automatic Matte Lip Pencil in Universal Red. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeUniversal RedClosest matchHappily Ever AfterHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%93#c42b35#c52d30Very close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth20%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Format and precision20%—not comparableRetractableNot listedNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 92/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $4 more
CVS
