Balancing & Perfecting Natural Finish Longwear Foundation 362WO Ochre dupes and alternatives Make Up For Ever
4.7 (555)·Deep tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$39Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (20%)4.3 (1,754)
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for normal skin
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (41%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: Tan/Deep with Warm Yellow Undertones
$29Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (41%)4.6 (558)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
90
Slight colour difference · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: Tan with Warm Neutral Undertones
The closest shade to Make Up For Ever Balancing & Perfecting Natural Finish Longwear Foundation 362WO Ochre (Deep tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Amazonian Clay 16-Hour Full Coverage Foundation in 44G Tan Golden, against Make Up For Ever Balancing & Perfecting Natural Finish Longwear Foundation in 362WO Ochre. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade362WO OchreClosest shade match44G Tan GoldenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%89#9e621f#9e682cVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared66
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Medium Coverage Foundation in 425 Medium Deep, against Make Up For Ever Balancing & Perfecting Natural Finish Longwear Foundation in 362WO Ochre. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade362WO OchreClosest overall alternative425 Medium DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%80#9e621f#95602eClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep tanDeepCloseDepth difference: 2.2
Retailer descriptionTanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, dry, sensitiveBoth marketed for normal/dry skin
Overall match 86/100Shade match 79/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraSame price
