Talc-Free Powder Blush Amour – 901 dupes and alternatives NARS
4.3 (1,914)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
59
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Satin rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Prada Touch Cream-To-Powder Soft Blur Longwear Blush in P72 Dahlia, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Amour – 901. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAmour – 901Closest matchP72 DahliaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%93#cf7374#d87678Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.