Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Looks identical · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Lancôme Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush in 351 Blushing Trésor, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Orgasm Edge – 778. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
Overall match 86/100Shade match 99/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Blushbaby, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Orgasm Edge – 778. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOrgasm Edge – 778Closest overall alternativeBlushbabyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%87#f6878c#fa9298Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightLightSameDepth difference 4.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 87/100Shade match 85/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.