Talc-Free Powder Blush Torrid - 252 dupes and alternatives NARS
4.3 (1,914)·Coral · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Berry rather than coral· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Looks identical · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than coral · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Balm rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Balm rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Peach rather than coral· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Peach rather than coral · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Ulta Beauty Collection Too Cheeky Lip & Cheek Color Stick in Charmed, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Torrid - 252. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTorrid - 252Closest shade matchCharmedHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour55%94#dc7d7f#d9817fVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall75
Finish50%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 81/100Shade match 97/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
RMS Beauty ReDimension Hydra Powder Blush in Pomegranate Fizz, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Torrid - 252. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTorrid - 252Closest overall alternativePomegranate FizzHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour55%86#dc7d7f#e6807cVery close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.7 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 82/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.