Talc-Free Powder Blush Dolce Vita – 888 dupes and alternatives NARS
4.3 (1,914)·Rose · Neutral · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Looks identical · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: coral, gold, and pink for medium skin tones
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose· Satin rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Satin rather than matte (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (25%)4.7 (988)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
54
Comfort & skin suitability
64
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · 24-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Plum rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Plum rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
ILIA Multi-Stick Cream Blush + Highlighter + Lip Tint in At Last, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Dolce Vita – 888. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDolce Vita – 888Closest shade matchAt LastHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%97#bd636b#c0656dLooks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall64
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format25%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%4016-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 77/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Thanks, Its MAC!, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Dolce Vita – 888. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDolce Vita – 888Closest overall alternativeThanks, Its MAC!How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall76
Colour55%79#bd636b#ba6764Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Overall match 82/100Shade match 76/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.