Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
$27Ulta Beauty(product price)$9 less (25%)4.7 (988)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than brown / nude· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than brown / nude · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
49
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
57
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than brown / nude· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than brown / nude · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Red Brown Rosy Bronze Bliush Trio
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude· Satin rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown / nude · Satin rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown / nude· Natural rather than shimmer (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown / nude · Natural rather than shimmer (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Mauve rather than brown / nude· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown / nude · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Red rather than brown / nude
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Red rather than brown / nude · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
43
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 10-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than brown / nude· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than brown / nude · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
34
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
67
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Saie SuperSuede Radiant Talc-Free Baked Powder Blush in Vino, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Orgasm Rush – 775. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOrgasm Rush – 775Closest matchVinoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%87#a74747#a3504aVery close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100Brown / nudeBrown / nudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared87
Finish50%80ShimmerDewyCloseDewy finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared70
Longevity50%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 87/100Shade match 92/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$8 less (22%)
Ulta Beauty
