Talc-Free Powder Blush Behave - 900 dupes and alternatives NARS
4.3 (1,914)·Mauve · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Brown / nude rather than mauve· Stick rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than mauve · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown / nude rather than mauve· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown / nude rather than mauve · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: soft rose beige (dream blur matte)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Plum rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
92
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Plum rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same format: powder· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
82
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Retailer shade note: raspberry, bronze and neutral pink, for medium skin tones.
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: soft cool pink with subtle shimmer
Ulta Beauty Collection Velvet Veil Minerals Powder Blush in Snapdragon, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Behave - 900. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBehave - 900Closest matchSnapdragonHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour55%92#db9a96#e29f9eVery close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100MauveMauveSameSame colour family
Overall match 86/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.