Talc-Free Powder Blush Obsession - 923 dupes and alternatives NARS
4.3 (1,914)·Coral · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than coral· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than coral · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Red rather than coral· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than coral · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Apricot rather than coral· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
67
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Apricot rather than coral · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Pink rather than coral· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than coral · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Peach rather than coral· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than coral · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush in Coral Crush, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Obsession - 923. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeObsession - 923Closest shade matchCoral CrushHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%90#e76658#ea5d4cVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall53
Finish50%45MatteDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than matte
Overall match 80/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Skinfinish Colorstruck Blush in Pink Flamingo, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Obsession - 923. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeObsession - 923Closest overall alternativePink FlamingoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%79#e76658#e55e5dClose colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100CoralCoralSameSame colour family
Overall match 88/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.