Talc-Free Powder Blush Thrill - 950 dupes and alternatives NARS
4.3 (1,914)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort· Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
59
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: powder· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Combination rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Deeper· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
62
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: electric pink glow / medium-tan contour
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than 16-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than 16-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than normal, dry, oily (skin types)
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Powder Blush Blur in Blushgasm, against NARS Talc-Free Powder Blush in Thrill - 950. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeThrill - 950Closest matchBlushgasmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%91#ffabd5#fda4d6Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 90/100Shade match 94/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $13 more
