Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow Aurora dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.6 (3,035)·Purple · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than purple· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than purple · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than purple · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: vibrant purple with silver, blue, violet and pink sparkle
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (50%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than purple· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than purple · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than purple· Powder rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than purple · Powder rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)4.6 (3,381)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Mauve rather than purple
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Mauve rather than purple · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than purple· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than purple · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Cool-toned pink with silver and pink sparkle
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Garden, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Aurora. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAuroraClosest matchGardenHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%87#cba1bf#d3a5cbVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PurplePurpleSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.