Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow Spark dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.6 (3,035)·Plum · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than plum· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than plum · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than plum · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Peach rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Peach rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Copper rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Copper rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Golden rather than plum· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Golden rather than plum · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Copper rather than plum· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than plum · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (50%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same finish: metallic
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than plum· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than plum· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than plum · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$19.50 less (65%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than plum · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Bronze rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than plum · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than plum · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Bronze rather than plum · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than plum · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
MAC Cosmetics Frost Eyeshadow in Nude Model, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Spark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSparkClosest shade matchNude ModelHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%88#c27167#c67971Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%15CoolWarmDifferentCool against warm
Colour family15%100PlumPlumSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall72
Finish65%83MetallicGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%35CreamPowderDifferentPowder rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%70Long-wearing8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 8-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 77/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Rose Haze, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Spark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSparkClosest overall alternativeRose HazeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall78
Colour60%92#c27167#bc7569Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 78/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$14 less (47%)
