Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow Luster dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.6 (3,035)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than golden· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than golden · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than golden· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than golden · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than golden· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than golden · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rosy-pink with subtle shimmer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than golden· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than golden · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Pink rather than golden· Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than golden · Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
ColourPop Chrome Liquid Eyeshadow in Bliss, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Luster. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLusterClosest shade matchBlissHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%70#db9a9a#cf8b85Close colourColour difference 5.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%79LightMediumSome differenceDepth difference 7.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Finish65%61ShimmerDuochromeSome differenceDuochrome finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 68/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NARS Total Seduction Eyeshadow Stick in Hustle, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Luster. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLusterClosest overall alternativeHustleHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%56#db9a9a#ce9586Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Overall match 79/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$5 less (17%)
