Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow Strobe dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.6 (3,035)·Golden · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$28Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.5 (1,590)
Matches: Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Liquid rather than cream (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
29
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Rose rather than golden· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than golden · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Urban Decay 24/7 Moondust Glittery Eyeshadow in Space Cowboy, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Strobe. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeStrobeClosest matchSpace CowboyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%79#b99893#af8e85Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87MediumLightCloseDepth difference 5.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall79
Finish65%83MetallicGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than metallic
Overall match 79/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (17%)
