Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow Eclipse dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.6 (3,035)·Silver · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: metallic pewter silver with sparkling reflects
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Lighter· Nude rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Nude rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than silver· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than silver · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (53%)4.4 (1,922)
Matches: Same format: cream
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than silver· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than silver · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: cream· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than silver· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than silver · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: a shimmering neutral beige / a rich navy blue
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Taupe rather than silver
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Taupe rather than silver · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: taupe with gold & silver sparkle
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than silver· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than silver · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (50%)4.0 (271)
Glitter · Opaque
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than silver· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than silver · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (70%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than silver· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than silver · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: taupe metallic with warm silvery shimmer/
holographic foil with shifts of pink, silver & gold sparkle
Rabanne Colorshot Pearly Liquid Eyeshadow in 90 Moon Child, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Eclipse. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEclipseClosest shade match90 Moon ChildHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#b5a692#b8ac9cVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall77
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65BuildableOpaqueSome differenceOpaque rather than buildable
Format15%60CreamLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 84/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milani Gilded Eyeshadow Sticks in Sterling, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Eclipse. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEclipseClosest overall alternativeSterlingHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour60%71#b5a692#b19f93Close colourColour difference 4.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Overall match 84/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $4 more
