Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow Moondust dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.6 (3,035)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Bobbi Brown Crystal Eyes Shimmer Eyeshadow Stick in Moonstone, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Moondust. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMoondustClosest shade matchMoonstoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#e3cab7#e7ccbaLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall79
Finish65%83MetallicGlitterCloseGlitter finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format15%85CreamStickCloseStick rather than cream
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Overall match 91/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.