Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow Halo dupes and alternatives RMS Beauty
4.6 (3,035)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$4 less (13%)4.7 (1,256)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Plum rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Bronze rather than brown· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Bronze rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$15 less (50%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: cream· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Peach rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Pink rather than brown· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than brown · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than cream (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: peach pink with hot pink sparkle
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Liquid rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Liquid rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Palette rather than cream (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Palette rather than cream (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Lighter· Mauve rather than brown· Liquid rather than cream (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Mauve rather than brown · Liquid rather than cream (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim hydration
Ulta Beauty Collection Cream Eye Shadow Stick in You Rock!, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Halo. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHaloClosest shade matchYou Rock!How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%76#c67e77#b68179Close colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100CreamCreamSameBoth cream
Wear & performance10% of overall58
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Overall match 82/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Bobbi Brown Long-Wear Waterproof Cream Eyeshadow Stick in Rose Haze, against RMS Beauty Eyelights Cream Eyeshadow in Halo. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHaloClosest overall alternativeRose HazeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%78#c67e77#bc7569Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 5.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.