Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Mauve rather than terracotta· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than terracotta · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (40%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than terracotta· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than terracotta · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than terracotta· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than terracotta · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than terracotta· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than terracotta · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than terracotta· Palette rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than terracotta · Palette rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than terracotta· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than terracotta· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than terracotta · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Bronze rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
32
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Bronze rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than terracotta · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in BRANDY FLAME, against Sephora Collection Sephora Colorful Waterproof Eyeshadow & Eyeliner Multi-Stick in 18 Terracotta Matte. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade18 Terracotta MatteClosest shade matchBRANDY FLAMEHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%98#a3746a#a47368Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 70/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Nude Mood, against Sephora Collection Sephora Colorful Waterproof Eyeshadow & Eyeliner Multi-Stick in 18 Terracotta Matte. Matched on pan 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade18 Terracotta MatteClosest overall alternativeNude MoodHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%90#a3746a#a87667Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 79/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $5 more
