Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 Dark dupes and alternatives Smashbox
4.3 (1,733)·Deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel· Not marketed for dry/oily skin
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin· Contains listed fragrance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin· Contains listed fragrance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin· Contains listed fragrance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$17 less (41%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
The closest shade to Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 Dark (Deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Charlotte Tilbury Unreal Skin Sheer Glow Tint Hydrating Foundation Stick in 13 Deep, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Dark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDarkClosest shade match13 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#965f34#925d33Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.5
Retailer descriptionDeepDeep tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 88/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Huda Beauty Easy Blur Natural Airbrush Foundation in Cocoa 510R, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Dark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDarkClosest overall alternativeCocoa 510RHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%87#965f34#9f6139Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96DeepDeep tanCloseDepth difference: 2.4
Retailer descriptionDeepDeep tanSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 89/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $11 more
