Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 Deep Rich Neutral dupes and alternatives Smashbox
4.3 (1,733)·Very deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with neutral undertones
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.01 less (71%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same light coverage
Differences: Slightly deeper· Radiant rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Radiant rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with neutral warm underones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral brown undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
The closest shade to Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 Deep Rich Neutral (Very deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Rude Perfect Base Foundation Stick in 19N Deep Neutral, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Deep Rich Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep Rich NeutralClosest shade match19N Deep NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#6f4433#704330Looks identicalColour difference 0.9 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared80
Finish35%—not comparableNaturalNot listedNot comparedFinish not listed for one product
Coverage30%100LightLightSameSame light coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Well People Skinforia Serum Foundation in 46 Rich Neutral, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Deep Rich Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep Rich NeutralClosest overall alternative46 Rich NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%87#6f4433#71493dVery close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 89/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.