Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 Dark Neutral dupes and alternatives Smashbox
4.3 (1,733)·Tan · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same light coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with neutral undertones
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.01 less (71%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for deep skin with warm golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.01 less (71%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral, subtle golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
The closest shade to Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 Dark Neutral (Tan · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Youngblood Loose Mineral Foundation in Sable, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Dark Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDark NeutralClosest shade matchSableHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#b37149#b66f45Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.2
Retailer descriptionDeepDeepBoth described as deepThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 1 of 4 compared80
Finish35%—not comparableNaturalNot listedNot comparedFinish not listed for one product
Coverage30%80LightBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared60
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 98/100Low confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Well People Skinforia Serum Foundation in 36 Tan Warm, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Dark Neutral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDark NeutralClosest overall alternative36 Tan WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%96#b37149#b07249Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.2
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 88/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $15 more
