Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/normal skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: light complexion with warm yellow undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral tones
The closest shade to Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 Fair (Very fair · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Foundation in 2 Neutral, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFairClosest shade match2 NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#f5d5b9#f5d5bbLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Overall match 83/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
about-face THE PERFORMER Skin-Focused Foundation in L1NEUTRAL, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Fair. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFairClosest overall alternativeL1NEUTRALHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#f5d5b9#f6d8beLooks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Overall match 93/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $14 more
