Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 Tan Dark dupes and alternatives Smashbox
4.3 (1,733)·Tan · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin· Contains listed fragrance
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Same light coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same light coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for deep tan skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · No SPF
$17.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (56%)4.2 (5,328)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: caramel - brown skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
49
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry skin
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium-Deep with Golden Undertones
$35Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (15%)4.5 (732)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin · No SPF
The closest shade to Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 Tan Dark (Tan · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Ulta Beauty Collection Moisturizing Complexion Stick in Tan Warm, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Tan Dark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTan DarkClosest shade matchTan WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#bc7e51#bc8054Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanMedium tanCloseDepth difference: 0.8
Retailer descriptionTanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 86/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Even Better Clinical Vitamin Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 45 Foundation in Medium Deep Warm 1, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Tan Dark. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTan DarkClosest overall alternativeMedium Deep Warm 1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#bc7e51#bf7c51Very close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionTanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 90/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $11 more
Target
