Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
74
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for fair to light skin with neutral undertones
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light skin with neutral undertones
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$8.74$12.49Ulta Beauty$32.26 less (79%)4.1 (11,038)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same light coverage· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No long-wear claim· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/oily skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: fair with neutral peach undertones
The closest shade to Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 Fair Light (Fair · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Age Perfect Radiant Serum Foundation in Rose Ivory, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Fair Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair LightClosest shade matchRose IvoryHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#f6caad#f7ccaeLooks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionFairNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared82
Finish35%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Coverage30%60LightMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than light
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall20
Skin type100%20Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 84/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Well People Skinforia Serum Foundation in 10 Fair Cool, against Smashbox Halo Healthy Glow Tinted Moisturizer SPF 25 in Fair Light. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFair LightClosest overall alternative10 Fair CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#f6caad#f2c9abLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.9
Retailer descriptionFairNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 92/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $9 more
