Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: metallic· Claims waterproof
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Golden rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Golden rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Looks identical · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
26
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than pink· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than pink · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
56
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 15-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Rose rather than pink· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
53
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Rose rather than pink · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow in Cultured Pearl, against Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Avalon. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAvalonClosest shade matchCultured PearlHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#e2afa2#e6b3a0Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNeutralNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedSheerNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%408-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Overall match 80/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Jelly Much Gel Eyeshadow in Buzzy, against Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Avalon. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeAvalonClosest overall alternativeBuzzyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour60%76#e2afa2#f3ad9eClose colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 81/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty$16 less (80%)
Sephora
