Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Peach rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
56
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Skin Transforming Powder Bronzer in Fair, against Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Troubadour. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTroubadourClosest shade matchFairHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#efc29d#ebc4a0Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared11
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedBuildableNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared20
Longevity50%208-hour wear24-hour wearDifferent24-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Overall match 62/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
bareMinerals GEN NUDE Liquid Mineral Eyeshadow in Moonstone, against Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Troubadour. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTroubadourClosest overall alternativeMoonstoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%81#efc29d#ebc9acClose colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a comfortable feel; your product does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.