Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering warm taupe / a shimmering blackened green
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than brown· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: a shimmering golden copper / a warm beige brown
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
28
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (15%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
20
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Nude Rose Gold, against Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Whisky. Matched on pan 6. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWhiskyClosest shade matchNude Rose GoldHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#af8d82#b88c7bClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared11
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPaletteDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%408-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 58/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Sephora Colorful Waterproof Eyeshadow & Eyeliner Multi-Stick in 07 Auburn Shimmer, against Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Whisky. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWhiskyClosest overall alternative07 Auburn ShimmerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%78#af8d82#b18a76Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared69
Longevity50%808-hour wear12-hour wearClose12-hour wear claimed against 8-hour wear
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $6 more
