Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 16-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
26
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: metallic amber gold with sparkling reflects
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (70%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: metallic· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
60
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 115 Bubbles Please, against Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Bungalow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBungalowClosest shade match115 Bubbles PleaseHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%87#e8b77c#dcae73Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88LightLightSameDepth difference 5.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared76
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%408-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Small Molten Metallic Eyeshadow in Kiss Of Klimt, against Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Bungalow. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBungalowClosest overall alternativeKiss Of KlimtHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#e8b77c#e9ba8bClose colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared97
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.