Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white and gold metallic glitter
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm beige nude with silvery green & teal duo chrome finish
Differences: White rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (70%)4.0 (6,939)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Claims crease resistance
Differences: White rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Dry rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (65%)4.5 (2,019)
Shimmer
Differences: White rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)· Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same format: stick· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· White rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
30
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · White rather than golden · 24-hour wear rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Green rather than golden· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
36
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Green rather than golden · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Sensitive rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than golden· Duochrome rather than metallic (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
69
Comfort & skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than golden · Duochrome rather than metallic (finish) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Combination rather than normal, dry, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: sparkling transparent icy blue with duo-chrome reflects
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than 8-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Nude 2, against Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Chateau. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChateauClosest shade matchNude 2How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%90#f3e7d2#f0e4c9Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared20
Finish65%5MetallicMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedOpaqueNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared61
Longevity50%708-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 8-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared36
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%33Normal, Dry, SensitiveDryDifferentBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 66/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Tin Pan Alley, against Tower 28 Beauty GoGo Cooling Shimmer Stick 8H Eyeshadow in Chateau. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeChateauClosest overall alternativeTin Pan AlleyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%75#f3e7d2#eaded2Close colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%85MetallicShimmerCloseShimmer finish rather than metallic
Pigmentation20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists an opacity
Format15%85StickCreamCloseCream rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall55
Longevity50%708-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 8-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 80/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $14 more
