Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Palette rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Palette rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Does not claim crease resistance· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
98
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Palette rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Palette rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Plum rather than brown· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than brown · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Plum rather than brown· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than brown · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: white chocolate, rosy velvet, & brownie bite
Charlotte Tilbury Exagger-Eyes Waterproof Eyeshadow Stick in Desert Sculpt, against Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Coffee Break. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCoffee BreakClosest shade matchDesert SculptHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall95
Colour60%92#a56c58#a66754Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedWarmUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Finish65%75MatteSatinSome differenceSatin finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, OilyNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 88/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Amaretto, against Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Coffee Break. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCoffee BreakClosest overall alternativeAmarettoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%89#a56c58#a96755Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $6 more
