Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Rose rather than copper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than copper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than copper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than copper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Bronze rather than copper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than copper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than copper· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than copper · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Bronze rather than copper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Bronze rather than copper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Taupe rather than copper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Taupe rather than copper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$5.01 less (29%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than copper· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than copper · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Terracotta rather than copper· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than copper · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than copper· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than copper · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than copper· Powder rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than copper · Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Pink rather than copper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than copper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (59%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than copper· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than copper · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: warm bronze with gold pinpoints
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than copper· Powder rather than stick (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than copper · Powder rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than copper· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than copper · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone· Silver rather than copper
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Silver rather than copper · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: cool neutral with silver pearl
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Keep It Ethereal, against Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Penny Passion. Matched on pan 7. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePenny PassionClosest shade matchKeep It EtherealHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%84#c28a7a#c3846dClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100CopperCopperSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall38
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Overall match 67/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon Glimmer Liquid Shadow in Spaced Out, against Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Penny Passion. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePenny PassionClosest overall alternativeSpaced OutHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%81#c28a7a#c38b72Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100CopperCopperSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall85
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%45StickLiquidSome differenceLiquid rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.