Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: metallic gunmetal grey with sparkling reflects
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (55%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Silver rather than grey· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than grey · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$6.01 less (30%)4.4 (1,922)
Metallic
Differences: Taupe rather than grey· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than grey · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Taupe rather than grey· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than grey · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than grey· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than grey · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Black rather than grey· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Black rather than grey · Powder rather than stick (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than grey· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 51% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than grey · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: brown pearl with subtle pink undertones
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than grey · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than grey · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Taupe rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Taupe rather than grey · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Silver rather than grey
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Silver rather than grey · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Ulta Beauty Collection Eyeshadow Singles in Modern Times, against Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Charcolit. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCharcolitClosest shade matchModern TimesHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#7d6f6c#7e736fVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall31
Finish65%20ShimmerMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%35StickPowderDifferentPowder rather than stick
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 67/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Nudestix Magnetic Luminous Eye Color in Smoke, against Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Charcolit. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCharcolitClosest overall alternativeSmokeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%85#7d6f6c#846f6bVery close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumLightCloseDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GreyGreySameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%85ShimmerMetallicCloseMetallic finish rather than shimmer
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall67
Longevity50%70Long-wearing11-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 11-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 85/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $3 more
