Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Rosy-pink with subtle shimmer
$9Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (55%)4.2 (2,863)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: shimmer
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Deeper· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: champagne cream, ballerina pink, & deep plum
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Palette rather than stick (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Palette rather than stick (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Duochrome rather than shimmer (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: sparkling rose gold with a duo-chrome bluish-green shift
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Powder rather than stick (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Powder rather than stick (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: shimmer· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
97
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: icy silvery baby pink with rainbow glitter
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (65%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than shimmer (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: cool-toned baby pink with silver and pink pinpoints
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: stick· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Rose rather than pink· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Rose rather than pink · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (15%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
39
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than shimmer (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Venetian, against Alleyoop 11th Hour Cream Eyeshadow & Liner Stick in Victory Blush. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeVictory BlushClosest matchVenetianHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour60%88#deb3b3#dab7b5Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100ShimmerShimmerSameSame shimmer finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100StickStickSameBoth stick
Wear & performance10% of overall85
Longevity50%70Long-wearing12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 12-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedSensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $2 more
