Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner 90s Pink dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (3,083)·Pink · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· 16-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · 16-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$9.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.50 less (66%)4.2 (1,893)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than pink· Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than pink · Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than pink· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than pink · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 77% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Intense Fuchsia (Not suitable for use on eyes)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
96
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
66
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 46% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 77% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$3.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$24.01 less (86%)4.0 (1,970)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than pink · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
96
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.50 less (66%)4.2 (1,893)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (71%)4.5 (5,856)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 77% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.3 (1,829)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Palladio Beauty Lip Liner Classic Pencil in Pink Frost, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in 90s Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade90s PinkClosest shade matchPink FrostHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%94#c14f72#c54c77Very close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth20%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%15WarmCoolDifferentCool against warm
Colour family10%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared51
Longevity30%706-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 6-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedPencilNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 72/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Huda Beauty Lip Contour 2.0 Automatic Matte Lip Pencil in Deep Rose, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in 90s Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade90s PinkClosest overall alternativeDeep RoseHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall74
Colour60%78#c14f72#bb5a6dClose colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth20%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 83/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.