Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner M.I.KISS dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (3,083)·Red · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.5 (66,830)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Berry rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
66
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Berry rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Pink rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than red· 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than red · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (50%)4.4 (5,141)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone
Differences: Nude rather than red· Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Looks identical
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than red · Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than red
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Intense Fuchsia (Not suitable for use on eyes)
L'Oréal Paris Blurfiller Blurring Lip Contour in Worth It Medium, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in M.I.KISS. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeM.I.KISSClosest shade matchWorth It MediumHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%98#da6376#d76377Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth20%99LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared40
Longevity30%406-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a format
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 74/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milk Makeup Line + Fill Lip Liner and Allover Lip Color in Shread, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in M.I.KISS. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeM.I.KISSClosest overall alternativeShreadHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall92
Colour60%95#da6376#d65f74Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth20%97LightMediumCloseDepth difference 2.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60CoolNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family10%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall100
Finish100%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared51
Longevity30%706-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 6-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedPencilNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 82/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.