Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner Savage Rose dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (3,083)·Red · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone· 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$23Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (18%)4.3 (189)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than red· Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
63
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than red · Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Pink rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
80
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than red · 16-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than red· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than red · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Brown rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 69% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.3 (1,829)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Plum rather than red
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Plum rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Bobbi Brown Lip Liner Pencil in Ruby, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Savage Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSavage RoseClosest shade matchRubyHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall89
Colour60%89#962c41#9d2b3dVery close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth20%97Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60WarmNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family10%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared40
Longevity30%406-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedPencilNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 70/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Huda Beauty Lip Contour 2.0 Automatic Matte Lip Pencil in Very Berry, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Savage Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSavage RoseClosest overall alternativeVery BerryHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall70
Colour60%73#962c41#823543Close colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth20%95Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 81/100Shade match 70/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.