Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner Walk of No Shame dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (3,083)·Rose · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.3 (1,866)
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Plum rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Plum rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Red rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Red rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown rather than rose · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Red rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Red rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Plum rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Plum rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Red rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 46% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Red rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.5 (66,830)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Looks identical · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Berry rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Berry rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.3 (1,866)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Red rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Both claim waterproof· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
66
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim comfort
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.3 (1,829)
Matches: Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than rose· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than rose · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: medium skin tone with warm undertone
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (11%)4.7 (2,137)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same cool undertone
Differences: Berry rather than rose· Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Looks identical
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than rose · Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
L'Oréal Paris Colour Riche Lip Liner in Au Naturale, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Walk of No Shame. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWalk of No ShameClosest shade matchAu NaturaleHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%93#9c353a#983b40Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth20%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%60CoolNeutralSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Finish100%78MatteSatinCloseSatin finish rather than matte
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared40
Longevity30%406-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedPencilNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 72/100Shade match 87/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Urban Decay 24/7 Glide-On Waterproof Lip Liner in Rush, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Walk of No Shame. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeWalk of No ShameClosest overall alternativeRushHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall83
Colour60%79#9c353a#913f44Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth20%100Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 83/100Shade match 83/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$3 less (11%)
