Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner Icon Baby dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (3,083)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than pink· 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than pink · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
$9.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.01 less (64%)4.7 (14,737)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 50% ingredient overlap
Differences: Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim comfort
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.3 (1,866)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.3 (1,866)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
e.l.f. Cosmetics Love Triangle Lip Filler Liner in Soft Pink, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Icon Baby. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIcon BabyClosest shade matchSoft PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall89
Colour60%83#e18179#d88784Close colourColour difference 3.3 (0 is identical)
Depth20%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family10%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared51
Longevity30%706-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 6-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedPencilNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 73/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Fenty Beauty Trace'd Out Pencil Lip Liner in Bubble Tini, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Icon Baby. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIcon BabyClosest overall alternativeBubble TiniHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall80
Colour60%70#e18179#e07378Close colourColour difference 4.9 (0 is identical)
Depth20%90LightLightSameDepth difference 4.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family10%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall100
Finish100%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared96
Longevity30%906-hour wear8-hour wearClose8-hour wear claimed against 6-hour wear
Smudge and transfer30%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim smudge or transfer resistance
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedPencilNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 80/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.