Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner Red Carpet Red dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (3,083)·Red · Cool · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than red· Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than red · Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than red
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Berry rather than red
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Berry rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.5 (66,830)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than red
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 46% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Pink rather than red
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Intense Fuchsia (Not suitable for use on eyes)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Pink rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$6Ulta Beauty(product price)$22 less (79%)4.5 (66,830)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Pink rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
$9.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.50 less (66%)4.2 (1,893)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Mauve rather than red· Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Mauve rather than red · Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
44
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
89
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.50 less (66%)4.2 (1,893)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 30% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$9.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.01 less (64%)4.1 (256)
Matches: Same cool undertone
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Berry rather than red
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
66
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Berry rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim comfort
Clinique Quickliner For Lips Lip Liner in Crushed Berry, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Red Carpet Red. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRed Carpet RedClosest shade matchCrushed BerryHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall74
Colour60%65#d91470#ca466dSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.6 (0 is identical)
Depth20%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.9 on the 0–100 scale
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared59
Longevity30%906-hour wear8-hour wearClose8-hour wear claimed against 6-hour wear
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a format
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 68/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
NYX Professional Makeup Retractable Long-Lasting Mechanical Lip Liner in Hot Pink, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Red Carpet Red. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRed Carpet RedClosest overall alternativeHot PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall74
Colour60%75#d91470#c12c6eClose colourColour difference 4.2 (0 is identical)
Depth20%91MediumMediumSameDepth difference 4.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 71/100Shade match 74/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.