Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner Iconic Nude dupes and alternatives Charlotte Tilbury
4.5 (3,083)·Nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lip liner overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 10%, wear and performance 25%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lip liner on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · 12-hour wear rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim smudge and transfer
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim smudge and transfer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
74
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Shimmery Rich Chocolate Brown
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim waterproof· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
66
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim comfort
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (75%)4.8 (784)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer· Does not claim waterproof
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Not listed rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim smudge and transfer
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
51
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than 6-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim smudge and transfer · Does not claim waterproof · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Palladio Beauty Lip Liner Classic Pencil in Natural, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Iconic Nude. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIconic NudeClosest shade matchNaturalHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall93
Colour60%89#8d5b4a#935943Very close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Depth20%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone10%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family10%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result10% of overall · none of 1 comparable50
Finish100%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Wear & performance25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared51
Longevity30%706-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 6-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Smudge and transfer30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims smudge or transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims waterproof wear; the match does not list it
Format and precision20%—not comparableNot listedPencilNot listed for eitherA format not listed for one product
Comfort & suitability5% of overall40
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Overall match 76/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Urban Decay 24/7 Glide-On Waterproof Lip Liner in 1993, against Charlotte Tilbury Lip Cheat Long-Lasting Waterproof Lip Liner in Iconic Nude. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeIconic NudeClosest overall alternative1993How they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%88#8d5b4a#905648Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth20%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 86/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$20 less (71%)
