Revealer Skin-Improving Foundation SPF 25 Rich Deep Neutral Olive 430 dupes and alternatives Kosas
3.6 (2,005)·Deep tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for combination skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Very deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same olive undertone· Same natural finish· Same medium coverage
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · No SPF
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
33
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$29 less (64%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: extra deep with warm golden undertones
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$33.01 less (73%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
30
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with warm, peach undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$29 less (64%)4.2 (561)
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
85
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
28
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal/combination skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep complexion with cool rosy undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$29 less (64%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than olive undertone· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than olive undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Same natural finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · No SPF
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for dry skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for normal skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very deep with neutral subtle brown undertones
The closest shade to Kosas Revealer Skin-Improving Foundation SPF 25 Rich Deep Neutral Olive 430 (Deep tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Amazonian Clay 16-Hour Full Coverage Foundation in 60H Mahogany Honey, against Kosas Revealer Skin-Improving Foundation SPF 25 in Rich Deep Neutral Olive 430. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich Deep Neutral Olive 430Closest shade match60H Mahogany HoneyHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%84#a26f61#98685cClose colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Normal, dry, combinationNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for normal/combination skin
Overall match 72/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
ColourPop Pretty Fresh Hyaluronic Hydrating Foundation in Deep Dark 200N, against Kosas Revealer Skin-Improving Foundation SPF 25 in Rich Deep Neutral Olive 430. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeRich Deep Neutral Olive 430Closest overall alternativeDeep Dark 200NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%81#a26f61#986857Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Overall match 80/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $11 more
