M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick Fleshpot dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,318)·Nude · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$12.01 less (48%)4.4 (280,394)
Matches: Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than warm undertone· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than warm undertone · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Jane Iredale ColorLuxe Hydrating Cream Lipstick in Toffee, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Fleshpot. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFleshpotClosest shade matchToffeeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%92#ce8e72#ca8971Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightMediumCloseDepth difference 2.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall100
Finish55%100SatinSatinSameSame satin finish
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 88/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revlon ColorStay Overtime Lipcolor in Faithful Fawn, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Fleshpot. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeFleshpotClosest overall alternativeFaithful FawnHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%90#ce8e72#d78d6cVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98LightLightSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 89/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.