M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick Peachstock dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,318)·Peach · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
28
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than peach · Shimmer rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · Does not claim comfort
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (44%)4.5 (10,199)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than peach · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Orange rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Orange rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: satin· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than peach · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Coral rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Coral rather than peach · Sheer tint rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Matches: Same finish: satin· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Nude rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
37
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Nude rather than peach · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than peach
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than peach · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Buxom Full-On Plumping Lip Cream in Peach Daiquiri, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Peachstock. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeachstockClosest shade matchPeach DaiquiriHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall93
Colour60%89#e39b73#e79b79Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PeachPeachSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 76/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Pat McGrath Labs SatinAllure Lipstick in Nude Fantasia, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Peachstock. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePeachstockClosest overall alternativeNude FantasiaHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall84
Colour60%84#e39b73#d49471Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%89LightLightSameDepth difference 4.8 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 81/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.