M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick Saint German dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,318)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$6.49$12.99Ulta Beauty$18.51 less (74%)4.1 (18,785)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Revlon Super Lustrous Lipstick in Flushed, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Saint German. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSaint GermanClosest shade matchFlushedHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%95#eb68ac#f26ab2Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 79/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Milk Makeup Cooling Water Jelly Tint Lip + Cheek Blush Stain in Burst, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Saint German. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSaint GermanClosest overall alternativeBurstHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall86
Colour60%78#eb68ac#f551a2Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 83/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
CVS
SephoraCosts $1 more
Ulta Beauty
