M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick Sitting Pretty dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,318)·Rose · Neutral · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$13Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (48%)4.2 (9,047)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same opacity: opaque· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than rose· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Looks identical · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)· 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Nude rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Nude rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Anastasia Beverly Hills Lip Velvet Full-Pigment Lip Mousse in Rosy Mauve, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Sitting Pretty. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSitting PrettyClosest shade matchRosy MauveHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#a6474d#a84e51Very close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightMediumCloseDepth difference 2.6 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 86/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Gucci Glow & Care Shine Lipstick in 215 Julie Blush, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Sitting Pretty. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSitting PrettyClosest overall alternative215 Julie BlushHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall93
Colour60%98#a6474d#a3464dLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family13%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Finish55%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared100
Longevity60%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 95/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $39 more
