M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick Morange dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.6 (2,318)·Orange · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than orange· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than orange · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Coral rather than orange
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Coral rather than orange · Sheer tint rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than orange· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than orange · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: satin· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than orange· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than orange · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than orange· Sheer tint rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than orange · Sheer tint rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than orange· Sheer tint rather than satin (finish)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than orange · Sheer tint rather than satin (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than orange· Sheer rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
56
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than orange · Sheer rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Peach rather than orange
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Peach rather than orange · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Does not claim hydration
MAC Cosmetics Squirt Plumping Lip Gloss Stick in Heat Sensor, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Morange. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMorangeClosest shade matchHeat SensorHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall87
Colour60%79#ff4d37#fd4642Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100OrangeOrangeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared30
Finish55%—not comparableSatinNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%30OpaqueSheerDifferentSheer rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 68/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
RMS Beauty Legendary Serum Lipstick in Ruby Moon, against MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Sleek Satin Lipstick in Morange. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeMorangeClosest overall alternativeRuby MoonHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall78
Colour60%80#ff4d37#f63d32Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88LightMediumCloseDepth difference 5.2 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 87/100Shade match 78/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $2 more
CVS
